4/29truth.com

Today marks the one year anniversary of the tragedy of 2007. The day that all San Francisco Bay Area Patriots will remember. The day that wicked and cowardly people struck a mighty blow against the I-35W MacArthur Overpass. The day whose events, even now, are highly controversial.

Indisputable scientific evidence recorded even as the incident unfolded raised perverse and often baffling questions. How did a bridge composed of incombustible cement and hardened steel collapse after being burned at just 800˚C? Why did “no sign of the truck remain at the scene”? Why would the bridge have fallen directly into its footprint, exactly as if it was demolished? Why were 4,000 Jews suspiciously absent from that overpass at 3:45 a.m? How could the collapse take 17 minutes when the fire department only arrived in ten? How did the driver of the truck escape unharmed and why does he not remember any of it? How was the governor able to fly 78 miles in under an hour?

In the months following the attack, 4/29 deniers have attempted to cloud the issue with rationalizations and fallacies. They claim that our premises are flawed - that the driver does remember what happened. That the driver was actually gravely wounded. That the bridge did not collapse as neatly as first claimed. Large parts of the truck were found. Jews unaware of the impending attack were on or around the overpass before and after the event. The governor actually gave his speech hours later at twilight, not in the middle of the night. I am sure 4/29 deniers have an equally convenient explanation for why all conflicting evidence was discovered hours or days later - more than enough time for it to be fabricated and planted by the conspiracy whose breadth and range continues to astonish.

These deniers do not realize what is most obvious. What testimony is always most accurate? Eyewitness testimony. The sights and sounds that witnesses claim to have experienced while fleeing for their lives under the tremendous stress of that day. What evidence is always most compelling? Zero-day evidence. Reports gathered immediately from the scene by whoever happened to be there, without the retrospective analysis that clouds issues so clear and simple. What facts are most credible? The facts that we know to be true because they are verified by the evidence that we know to be true. Which theories are most powerful? Theories which explain everything. Theories that aren’t incomplete and don’t have loose ends, except the kind of loose ends that implicate the obvious wrongdoers and point directly at the obvious conclusion.

There are three kinds of people in this world. One: the wicked and powerful people at the heart of this exceptionally powerful conspiracy and their influential goons. Two: the virtuous people who have realized the truth behind the conspiracy and understand what we must do. Three: the foolishly deluded and self-deluded public for whom we are their only protectors. It is our duty to speak our truth to those who lack the courage to see it themselves. It is our duty to protect and defend those who lack the courage to protect and defend themselves. If you ever doubt, if you ever become passive or accepting, if you ever feel the fog of anger clearing from your head, just remember the emotion that you felt on that day. Do not let the ungrateful bleating of sheep or the specious questions of skeptics distract you from your purpose. Keep fighting for the truth.

The big government coverup behind 4/29 is complete. This morning the CHP announced that James Mosque-Queda the “driver” responsible for the first attack on the MacArthur Overpass, was being cleared of all charges.

The California Highway Patrol is not recommending that charges be brought against the driver who wrecked his gasoline truck in the MacArthur Maze early one Sunday morning nearly a year ago, touching off an explosion and fire that caused $5.9 million in damage and closed part of the busy interchange for 26 days.

One hand washes the other. Mosque-Queda attacks a bridge full of civilians, CC Myers rakes in over $5 million in under a month, the state-run mass transit system loads civilians onto its trains, and Governor Schwarzenegger laughs all the way to his private helicopter.

And the attacker? James Mosque-Queda “has never talked publicly about the crash and did not return our phone calls” because he’s busy raking in big bucks as “a motivational speaker”.

You can’t make this stuff up. No one would believe it.

At 1430 today, saboteurs posing as California Highway operatives attempted to sabotage the 4/29 overpass. Posing as a maintenance crew and using a routine “sweeping” activity as cover, government agents set pyrotechnic devices along the overpass which “ignited foam used in the joints between the concrete slabs of the overpass”. The fire quickly spread, raining fire onto the commuters below.

The plot appears to have failed because the saboteurs mistakenly used incendiary, not explosive charges on the bridge. This attack proves that sabotage caused the 4/29 collapse, since this fire was not able to melt the steel supports as 4/29 deniers claim happened in the original attack.

Had their plot succeeded the MacArthur freeway exchange, Bay Area commuters, and the economy of Northern Californa would have been once again devastated by a second major terrorist attack in less than 1 year.

Reports do not yet indicate how many Jews avoided the MacArthur maze in the hours leading up to this attack.

In early 2007 Rudy Giuliani’s campaign stood tall and proud - “America’s Mayor” was America’s next president, easily ahead in every poll. But in the fall of 2007 Rudy Giuliani’s campaign was struck with unexpected disaster. Near-simultaneous attacks in Iowa, New Hampshire, and Michigan left New York’s mayor badly damaged. A short time later in Florida his campaign had completely, spontaneously collapsed.

Was it really a spontaneous collapse, or was Giuliani’s implosion the result of a secret controlled demolition? Let’s examine the facts.

First, while such collapses were common 50 or 100 years ago there is no way a modern campaign would just spontaneously collapse. Giuliani’s $60,929,240 campaign had been carefully engineered to withstand the harshest partisan attacks. In past years smaller, flimsier campaigns have stood strong against far more serious damage.

Second, consider the minor extent of pre-Florida damage. There were no signs of damage prior to the Iowa primary and even after the first impact Giuliani had lost only 56 delegates out of 2,380. Yet we are led to believe that this small blow could have initiated such a catastrophic collapse? We’re told this was the first campaign in history to spontaneously collapse due to such minor damage?

Now let’s examine the players in the game. Bernard Kerick, Giuliani’s campaign manager, was indicted on 16 counts of tax fraud and other federal charges. Giuliani Partners has been linked to the Qatar Ministry of the Interior and Abdullah Bin Khalid Al-Thani. The candidate himself was caught billing tens of thousands of dollars between obscure agencies. No act of sabotage would be too appalling for the suspicious and secretive agents at the center of the organization.

Finally, examine the collapse itself. Rudy’s campaign collapsed straight down onto its own footprint in a single smooth linear movement at nearly freefall speeds. This “collapse” bears no similarity to the sudden unpredictable, shuddering collapses of Gary Hart, Michael Dukakis, David Duke, or Mark Foley. Recordings at press conferences contain mysterious popping sounds similar to thermite charges. This event was in no way accidental; this collapse was exceptionally orderly and well-rehearsed.

Perhaps most incriminating, 4,000 Florida Jews did not show up to vote on the morning of the collapse. Reports from several sources indicate that many of those Jews had received phone calls the morning of the collapse warning them about the disaster. Calls originating from Karl Rove’s Republican Party.

So if this wasn’t a “collapse” then what was it? Reputable news agencies broadcast advance warnings of the implosion. Reports surfaced from Giuliani’s office that they were planning to “pull it“. And as the disaster unfolded, Rudy Giuliani calmly “departed to kill time in a nearby hangar“.

Why were the warnings ignored? Who in the chain of command will be held accountable for this failure? Did mysterious traders with prior knowledge profit from the destruction as the stock market reacted to the news? Why has there been a complete coordinated media blackout from the Giuliani campaign since the January 30?

Democracy was dealt a terrible blow that cold Florida morning in late January as one of our nation’s mightiest campaigns fell. The Americans who lost a candidate, the donors who lost more than $60 million in funds, and the families of the workers who were caught inside the campaign on that fateful day are owed an explanation. There are numerous red flags in the official story. Questioning that story is an act of responsible citizenship.

Earlier today “a man claiming to have a bomb strapped to his chest walked into Sen. Hillary Clinton’s campaign office in Rochester, New Hampshire, and took several people hostage“. Before he could lock the doors the internet was abuzz over the obvious connection: the same team that killed vince foster is once again putting more innocents in harm’s way to serve their own sinister interests.

As with Vince Foster’s death, rumors of the plant have begun to circulate almost immediately. The incident occurred on the east coast. The Clinton campaign has trotted out an “official story”. No video of the “bomber” entering the building exists. Many differing and contradictory reports are surfacing concerning details of the event.

Is this the work of the FALN who raided the campaign headquarters of Carter-Mondale in Chicago … IN 1984? Is Clinton manufacturing this incident to distract from her planted supporter at the Republican debate? Or perhaps this is the work of the Obama campaign, staging a terrorist attack to allow the muslim candidate to save the day and prove that he would be unwilling to stage a terrorist attack against the US? Like Vince Foster, was Troy Stanley yet another of Hillary’s jilted lovers? The mind reels.

With so many possible motives and opportunities it is a near statistical impossibility that this can be what it seems. Under the circumstances it is only reasonable to assume foul play unless otherwise can be proven. Even if it wasn’t a plant, it says a lot about her that we would even consider the possibility.

Every news outlets seems content to parrot the official story: Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger’s order to delay crab season was nothing more than a well-meaning effort to protect seafood lovers from the oil leaked by the Cosco Busan. This explanation is laughable to anyone who is courage enough to read between the lines. Who is behind fabricating this panic in the crab markets? Follow the money and you will find that the governor’s order is just the tip of a sinister crab-shaped iceberg.

Every year the Department of Fish and Game opens crab season in different areas at different times. Every November, Carpetbaggers from Oregon and Northern California sail into southern waters taking Southern California crab and infuriating President Larry Collins and his San Francisco Crab Boat Owners Association. When their local season opens at the end of November the northerners move back home to haul in a second catch, leaving local fishermen to fight over their leavings. One day the San Francisco bug peddlers decided they had enough.

In 2005, Fish and Game scheduled San Francisco crab season to open on November 15, two weeks before the Northern season. The bosses at Big Crab fabricated a price dispute to keep the season closed until November 23, the day the Oregon season opened, creating an embargo to keep Northern fishermen out of Southern waters until the day they were scheduled to return home. COINCIDENCE? You don’t need to be a genius to realize that a few people will make a lot more money if they sell an entire season of crab at higher prices after a slow start rather than splitting the catch and selling early.

This year, dungeness season was scheduled to open this year in the central and southern region from November 3 and in the northern region from November 24 giving northern fishermen nearly a month in southern waters … a disaster for local crabmongers. Then suddenly a convenient disaster struck, and the Cosco Busan’s 58,000 gallon oil spill became a gift from heaven as far as crab fishermen were concerned. Like the Project for a New American Century after 9/11, the SFCBOA seized the opportunity, fanned the fires of fear, and started putting their secret resource grab into action.

On November 10 the Members of crab boat owners association voted to delay their season until December 1, one week after the Northern season opens. On November 13 the governor caved to their pressure and announced that he would postpone crab season up to 3 miles from San Francisco. Not content with the success of their embargo, CrabPEC announced that they would be extending their embargo regardless of what Arnold’s order said and “stated they are unwilling to set gear in any of the waters because even the allowed zone might be affected by remnants of the fuel spill“.

This exoskeletal mafiosa are as disciplined as they are ruthless, forcing everyone to march in lockstep and tolerating no dissent. One small boat attempted to fish crab in a safe zone and was met at the docks by the San Francisco Crab Mafia. The Crabfather made the lone fisherman an offer he couldn’t refuse and Tony Anello, Crab Baron of Sonoma County, “dropped them back into the marina at Bodega Bay“.

And what will the mainstream media tell you? Nothing you’ve read here, friend. Two weeks from now after the Northern boats leave empty for Oregon these local shallow-water pirates will start selling you their treasure at inflated prices while the mainstream media tries to tell you that you ought to be thankful that you waited with an empty plate for almost a month to pay 60% more than last year to eat crabs they claimed were poison just two weeks ago.

That aftertaste isn’t fuel oil, it’s the bitter flavor of conspiracy.

Why is the Bay Area’s transit infrastructure subject to fierce attacks. A better question might be why do Americans insist on overlooking the obvious pattern?

• All American airplanes are grounded on 9/11.
• A fiery “truck crash” destroys a Bay Area highway ramp on 4/29.
• The Bay Bridge suffers a freak collision with a tanker truck — exactly 42.9 minutes before 9:11.

The vital bridge suffered a 100-foot gash — and San Francisco’s water ways experienced their worst oil spill in over twenty years. But what message were the attackers trying to send? It becomes blindingly obvious when the same pattern emerges as in the past “accident” on 4/29.

April’s truck driver (who conveniently didn’t remember his own accident) had a glaring criminal record and a history of previous safety violations on his truck. In Wednesday’s attack, the ship — mysteriously piloted by an all-Chinese crew — was placed under the charge of a captain who had previously drove a cargo ship aground just a few months earlier. One reporter even discovered he’d already had four “incidents” triggering investigations by the Pilot Commissioners Board, and he’d been “counseled” about his bad ship piloting. Was this the same crew that was caught shipping World Trade Center steel to Chinese dealers? But we’d just be CRAZY to suggest that assigning this captain to pilot a 65,131-ton load, under the narrow opening of the Bay Bridge, on one of the foggiest days of the year was anything other than an innocent mistake.

Meanwhile, the Asians who dominate the San Francisco seafood markets are raking in the yuan after Arnold Schwarzenegger cancelled crab season in a move that can’t help reminding us of the jews who were caught short-selling airline stocks before 9/11. We know that 4,000 jews were not on the Bay Bridge when their Chinese proxies rammed it. And once again we ask: did Arnold know?

Why is our transportation infrastructure under attack? And why is our way of life under attack? (The Bay Area’s liberal volunteer base has diverted themselves from political activities to trying to save oil-soaked birds…) Are we powerless to defend ourselves?

Only if we refuse to see the truth.

In 1962 the Department of Defense planned Operation Northwoods, a plot to stage secret attacks against United States targets. The plot proposed “large scale United States military operations”, a “terror campaign … pointed at refugees seeking haven in the United States” by “exploding a few plastic bombs in carefully chosen spots”.

Does this plot remind anyone of anything? An incident in early April, perhaps, when an immigrant named James Mosqueda supposedly exploded his tanker truck under the busiest freeway overpass in the bay area? Or perhaps the spontaneous collapse of a busy downtown bridge?

Establishment operatives are quick to discredit anyone who points out the striking resemblances between Operation Northwoods and the events of 4/29. Unfortunately for anyone brave enough to think for themselves it is obvious that the government is not above staging simulated terrorist activities, inciting civil unrest, or exploiting a truck driver’s criminal record or ethnic heritage especially if it means an excuse to pack their citizens onto trains, literally railroading them toward communal, socialized transportation.

A “firey” crash in Grand Junction, Colorado bears all the same marks of 4/29: a truck, an overpass, smoke scarring from a fire that engulfed the bridge. Unlike 4/29 the truck even hit a bridge support directly.

So why didn’t the bridge collapse like the 580/880 interchange? This story demonstrates that a truck crash cannot collapse an overpass - unless that bridge is loaded with thermite demolition charges.

New reports from wednesday’s bridge collapse continue to raise troubling questions over the role of the Minnesota state government. Let’s start with the collapse of the structure itself:

As videos show, the 458-foot span took less than 4 seconds to collapse neatly into its footprint at nearly free-fall speeds. Like skyscrapers, bridges are not designed to implode. For the bridge to collapse in this fashion, all of the load bearing supports would have had to fail at exactly the same time. Is the government’s “truss theory” plausible? Thermite is necessary, especially since witnesses claim to have heard “explosions” and loud booms or other popping sounds prior to the collapse. Is this how a bridge not scheduled for replacement until 2020 would respond on an otherwise ordinary day? Eyewitnesses report an event “as loud as a plane crash“, hinting at what might have really taken the bridge down.

Investigators are attempting to simulate the collapse with a computer model generated by a University of Minnesota PhD Candidate but have been unable to do so: “the computer analysis involves removing selected parts of the bridge structure until the bridge falls down“. Faulty computer simulations have long been the tool of coverup artists, especially those in the habit of producing simulations with 40% of the structure’s supports removed.

Don’t let eccentric conspiracy theorists discredit the truth movement and persuade you that the only legitimate story is the official story. It may be too early to point fingers, but even the most cursory reading of yesterday’s news reveals questions that the authorities seem all too eager to simply dismiss.