<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Attack on Camera&#8221; - Retraction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.429truth.com/2007/05/02/attack-on-camera-retraction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.429truth.com/2007/05/02/attack-on-camera-retraction/</link>
	<description>a campaign to expose the truth of 4/29</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 4/29truth.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 429truth responds to the Oakland Tribune</title>
		<link>http://www.429truth.com/2007/05/02/attack-on-camera-retraction/comment-page-1/#comment-412</link>
		<dc:creator>4/29truth.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 429truth responds to the Oakland Tribune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 19:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.429truth.com/2007/05/02/attack-on-camera-retraction/#comment-412</guid>
		<description>[...] photograph supposedly depicting a mushroom cloud over Oakland was retracted two days before the Oakland Tribune published their story, yet the picture was presented as known [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] photograph supposedly depicting a mushroom cloud over Oakland was retracted two days before the Oakland Tribune published their story, yet the picture was presented as known [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neo-Con</title>
		<link>http://www.429truth.com/2007/05/02/attack-on-camera-retraction/comment-page-1/#comment-376</link>
		<dc:creator>Neo-Con</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 21:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.429truth.com/2007/05/02/attack-on-camera-retraction/#comment-376</guid>
		<description>Message removed by moderator.

Neo-Cons have no place telling the truth here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Message removed by moderator.</p>
<p>Neo-Cons have no place telling the truth here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.429truth.com/2007/05/02/attack-on-camera-retraction/comment-page-1/#comment-366</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 18:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.429truth.com/2007/05/02/attack-on-camera-retraction/#comment-366</guid>
		<description>Someone regularly (although not daily) posts the Lawrence webcam shots on Youtube.   The Search URL is this:
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Lawrence+Hall+of+Science+April&#38;search=Search

This is the URL of the 4/29 vid itself:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VscACqomqWE

The sun comes up about 30 seconds into it, and the screen is practically dead grey.

The poster's comment for the vid says this:

[blockquote]
Timelapse video taken from the Lawrence Hall of Science in Berkeley, CA.

Video taken on April 29, 2007

Partialy sunny with fog and clouds. Unfortunatly because of the fog, the gigantic fireball from the accident at the Macarthur Maze is not visible.
http://sfgate.com/cgi- bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2007/04/30/MNGK8PI1CI1.DTL

The Lawrence Hall of Science website:
http://www.lawrencehallofscience.org/
[/blockquote]

I am glad you had the cojones to recant the faked frame when you found out about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone regularly (although not daily) posts the Lawrence webcam shots on Youtube.   The Search URL is this:<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Lawrence+Hall+of+Science+April&amp;search=Search"  rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Lawrence+Hall+of+Science+April&amp;search=Search</a></p>
<p>This is the URL of the 4/29 vid itself:<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VscACqomqWE"  rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VscACqomqWE</a></p>
<p>The sun comes up about 30 seconds into it, and the screen is practically dead grey.</p>
<p>The poster&#8217;s comment for the vid says this:</p>
<p>[blockquote]<br />
Timelapse video taken from the Lawrence Hall of Science in Berkeley, CA.</p>
<p>Video taken on April 29, 2007</p>
<p>Partialy sunny with fog and clouds. Unfortunatly because of the fog, the gigantic fireball from the accident at the Macarthur Maze is not visible.<br />
<a href="http://sfgate.com/cgi-"  rel="nofollow">http://sfgate.com/cgi-</a> bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2007/04/30/MNGK8PI1CI1.DTL</p>
<p>The Lawrence Hall of Science website:<br />
<a href="http://www.lawrencehallofscience.org/"  rel="nofollow">http://www.lawrencehallofscience.org/</a><br />
[/blockquote]</p>
<p>I am glad you had the cojones to recant the faked frame when you found out about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agent Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.429truth.com/2007/05/02/attack-on-camera-retraction/comment-page-1/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>Agent Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 17:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.429truth.com/2007/05/02/attack-on-camera-retraction/#comment-363</guid>
		<description>Agent Jay here. I am only willing to say this much: having access to the camera in question, I took it upon myself to preserve the TRUTH. I am the one who grabbed this frame from the video and did so knowing full well that (a) my supervisors would edit the video when they arrived at work that day and (b) if caught, I would face SEVERE discipline. What I never expected was that this site would bow to outside forces and DISCREDIT me and the picture. I can only say again that this picture is 100% TRUE. This site should rename itself 429SELLOUT.

Semper Fi!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agent Jay here. I am only willing to say this much: having access to the camera in question, I took it upon myself to preserve the TRUTH. I am the one who grabbed this frame from the video and did so knowing full well that (a) my supervisors would edit the video when they arrived at work that day and (b) if caught, I would face SEVERE discipline. What I never expected was that this site would bow to outside forces and DISCREDIT me and the picture. I can only say again that this picture is 100% TRUE. This site should rename itself 429SELLOUT.</p>
<p>Semper Fi!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hankmeister</title>
		<link>http://www.429truth.com/2007/05/02/attack-on-camera-retraction/comment-page-1/#comment-346</link>
		<dc:creator>Hankmeister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 08:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.429truth.com/2007/05/02/attack-on-camera-retraction/#comment-346</guid>
		<description>There is no need for a retraction. Clearly this photo is "fake but accurate." Our progressive media is always saying that about those hard hitting stories they put about about RethugliKKKans. You know, Dan Rather's fake but accurate Bush TANG memos revelation. It almost got us an election. There's still a story here fellow truthers.

WE MUST CONTINUE SPEAKING TRUTH TO POWER!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no need for a retraction. Clearly this photo is &#8220;fake but accurate.&#8221; Our progressive media is always saying that about those hard hitting stories they put about about RethugliKKKans. You know, Dan Rather&#8217;s fake but accurate Bush TANG memos revelation. It almost got us an election. There&#8217;s still a story here fellow truthers.</p>
<p>WE MUST CONTINUE SPEAKING TRUTH TO POWER!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.429truth.com/2007/05/02/attack-on-camera-retraction/comment-page-1/#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 02:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.429truth.com/2007/05/02/attack-on-camera-retraction/#comment-333</guid>
		<description>If you want to see what an actual "attack on camera" looks like, here's one:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18324251/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to see what an actual &#8220;attack on camera&#8221; looks like, here&#8217;s one:<br />
<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18324251/"  rel="nofollow">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18324251/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacqueline Tourez</title>
		<link>http://www.429truth.com/2007/05/02/attack-on-camera-retraction/comment-page-1/#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacqueline Tourez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 02:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.429truth.com/2007/05/02/attack-on-camera-retraction/#comment-331</guid>
		<description>Retraction my ass! That whitewash has all the characteristics of a CIA disinformation operation! It's short, it's buried, and it's a retraction! Wake up, people!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Retraction my ass! That whitewash has all the characteristics of a CIA disinformation operation! It&#8217;s short, it&#8217;s buried, and it&#8217;s a retraction! Wake up, people!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: krazeeloon</title>
		<link>http://www.429truth.com/2007/05/02/attack-on-camera-retraction/comment-page-1/#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>krazeeloon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 00:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.429truth.com/2007/05/02/attack-on-camera-retraction/#comment-324</guid>
		<description>levintofu Says: Hindsight is always backwards!!

Very Profound... Deep, man, Deep "cough, cough",, "dude, quit bogarting, let me have a drag."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>levintofu Says: Hindsight is always backwards!!</p>
<p>Very Profound&#8230; Deep, man, Deep &#8220;cough, cough&#8221;,, &#8220;dude, quit bogarting, let me have a drag.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mw</title>
		<link>http://www.429truth.com/2007/05/02/attack-on-camera-retraction/comment-page-1/#comment-320</link>
		<dc:creator>mw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 00:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.429truth.com/2007/05/02/attack-on-camera-retraction/#comment-320</guid>
		<description>Wait a minute. A retraction???? A f*cking retraction??? Who got to you? And who are you &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait a minute. A retraction???? A f*cking retraction??? Who got to you? And who are you <i>really</i>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hankmeister</title>
		<link>http://www.429truth.com/2007/05/02/attack-on-camera-retraction/comment-page-1/#comment-319</link>
		<dc:creator>Hankmeister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 00:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.429truth.com/2007/05/02/attack-on-camera-retraction/#comment-319</guid>
		<description>I for one won't be satisfied until the government produces verifiable frame-coded security video tape proving this wasn't another one of its conspiracies. I mean, how many security cameras must have been grinding away in the area when this "accident" happened. Sheesh, we're not morons you know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I for one won&#8217;t be satisfied until the government produces verifiable frame-coded security video tape proving this wasn&#8217;t another one of its conspiracies. I mean, how many security cameras must have been grinding away in the area when this &#8220;accident&#8221; happened. Sheesh, we&#8217;re not morons you know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.462 seconds -->
<!-- Cached page served by WP-Cache -->
