Archive for May 3rd, 2007

The Secret Second Crash

Thursday, May 3rd, 2007

An almost identical tanker truck crashed, exploded, and destroyed a freeway ramp in downtown Houston, within 48 hours of the Bay Area crash.

Texas Freeway Tanker Explosion

Could the exact same thing happen twice, by accident, within just two days?

Maybe it was a test run. Or a coordinated plot to disrupt interstate commerce. If so, it certainly accomplished (yet again?) its goal of disrupting commercial ground transportation.

What’s more amazing is this entirely unexplained “coincidence” has gone virtually unreported by the mainstream media. All the pieces are there, but they’ll apparently only be put together by a coalition of the net roots. Take back your right to be informed — about safety, about homeland security, and especially about your government.

And for those of you who are still skeptical that the government is involved in these crashes…

This second crash occurred just three hours from Crawford, Texas.

WebSense caves to 429truth pressure

Thursday, May 3rd, 2007

Good news to truth-seekers, censorship opponents, and free speech advocates everywhere. WebSense, which formerly censored, has reportedly caved to immense popular pressure and shut down the filtering of

From: "PT"
Date: May 3, 2007 1:07:34 AM PDT
Subject: websense 429 censorship

I'm a student at Brunel University in London, England and have to suffer under the idiosyncrasies of the websense categorisation and filtering system. Because access to blocked sites is sometimes required for academic reasons we have a feedback system where we can report sites we believe have been wrongly categorised or to which we desire access to our central computer team for assessment. As soon as I saw the story about on boingboing I checked and it was indeed classified as "sex" by websense, which is a restricted category for users at Brunel. This does not totally bock content, but instead provides irritating warning pages every time you access something which often breaks a website or causes it to display improperly because from what I can work out the cgi script that generates the warning page and inserts it before allowing you to proceed fails to pass things like form data, referring page info and so on.

I reported this as a categorisation error to the computer centre and I've just received an e-mail confirming that they agree there is no sexual content and have forwarded this to websense for review. As of 9am BST no longer appears to be blocked. This could just be for users here at Brunel and I'm unable to check independently. Perhaps you could ask your readers to see if this was a global category change or just an exception inserted for Brunel users?

Keep up the good work!

Many thanks


This is a major victory and truly a great day for free speech and liberty around the world.

4/29: Who Benefits?

Thursday, May 3rd, 2007

Most readers of this this forum are becoming aware that what many are calling “Oakland Harbor’s Pearl Harbor” appears to have been a grand and successful hoax perpetrated by high government officials of America and (perhaps) other countries. When a crime is committed the first thing that should be done is to look for a motive. Who benefits? Who gained the most after the crime was committed?

The collapse has severely restricted private automobile users’ access to highways while state government was quick to offer free public transit at taxpayer expense. This was a massive coup for Bay Area Rapid Transit, figuratively and literally. NPR recently broadcast a public transit employee saying that “as it happens we have a new ad campaign starting up — we made the media buy weeks ago, of course, so it obviously wasn’t in response to the fire…” All too convenient if you ask me: why ask drivers to ride public transit when you can use terrorism? The notoriously liberal LA Times asks “Should tankers hauling such flammable material even be permitted to pass through such constricted spaces? Who should be allowed to drive them?” If they get their way CHP Sgt. Jim Epperson points out that “If you build a big city and put a gas station in it, there’s no other way to get there except to go through the city.” The sergeant is of course hinting at the state’s plan to ban cars in public and forcing everyone into mass-transit train cars and buses driven by only those privileged collectivists still favored by the state with driving privileges. It is not enough for the collectivists to fund communist transit systems from taxes collected at gunpoint – must they force us to ride mass transit at gunpoint as well?!?

The destruction of the overpass has increased gridlock and commute times, keeping working parents away from their children and harming the well-being of those traditional American families. Which San Francisco organization has been steadily working to destroy the American family? Our researchers have already discovered that “429” may be a telltale sign of homosexual operatives at work: the numbers spell “GAY” using the keypad of an American telephone.


Also suspicious is a well-timed “rally” by the anti-car, anti-highway-overpass, homosexual-friendly group Critical Mass held nine hours before the attack, likely to provide distraction and cover in the west for the covert demolitions team working on the east side of the Bay Bridge. The Critical Mass manifesto espousing a “counter-technological tradition” certainly allows them ample room for covert military strikes at the heart of modern technological progress. The demolition team’s work has brought more demand for truck “safety” regulators and brought more money and power to the same DPT workers who had unrestricted access to those bridges and overpasses before the attack. COINCIDENCE?

Hats off to and their willingness to ask the tough questions about 4/29, which they agree ‘smacks too much of a script for a plain “conspiracy theory”‘. As they point out the “Decrepit Freeway [was] Demolished Ahead of Schedule to Influence 9/11 Truth Movement”. joins our suspicions by reporting that no one has benefited more than 9/11 conspiracy deniers themselves who are seizing on the tragedy of 4/29 as a way to mock their search for the truth. IndependentSources claims that 4/29 “was a “black bag op” carried out jointly by the CIA and the Office of the First Lady” but we see the fingerprints of different organizations on this one. The internet in general and the San Francisco bay area in particular is filled with fools and scoffers who theorize that 4/29 was merely a common accident and that common fire melted the bridge’s steel as a way to refute the widely accepted theory that demolition charges were necessary to bring down those towers. Yes, dear readers, I am implying that in exactly the same way that the World Trade Center was demolished the overpass could have been intentionally demolished by 9/11 conspiracy deniers themselves! Any website or organization which uses the events of 4/29 to discredit the 9/11 conspiracy should be viewed with very serious suspicion. They have shown that they are all too willing to benefit both politically and materially from this tragedy.

Meanwhile, more puzzling evidence has appeared to challenge the official story. Portions of the burned concrete have inexplicably “turned pink like a salmon“, and investigators are expanding their investigation of the near-miss on the Golden Gate Bridge as evidence of sabotage surfaces. You read it here first!