Most readers of this this forum are becoming aware that what many are calling “Oakland Harbor’s Pearl Harbor” appears to have been a grand and successful hoax perpetrated by high government officials of America and (perhaps) other countries. When a crime is committed the first thing that should be done is to look for a motive. Who benefits? Who gained the most after the crime was committed?
The collapse has severely restricted private automobile users’ access to highways while state government was quick to offer free public transit at taxpayer expense. This was a massive coup for Bay Area Rapid Transit, figuratively and literally. NPR recently broadcast a public transit employee saying that “as it happens we have a new ad campaign starting up — we made the media buy weeks ago, of course, so it obviously wasn’t in response to the fire…” All too convenient if you ask me: why ask drivers to ride public transit when you can use terrorism? The notoriously liberal LA Times asks “Should tankers hauling such flammable material even be permitted to pass through such constricted spaces? Who should be allowed to drive them?” If they get their way CHP Sgt. Jim Epperson points out that “If you build a big city and put a gas station in it, there’s no other way to get there except to go through the city.” The sergeant is of course hinting at the state’s plan to ban cars in public and forcing everyone into mass-transit train cars and buses driven by only those privileged collectivists still favored by the state with driving privileges. It is not enough for the collectivists to fund communist transit systems from taxes collected at gunpoint - must they force us to ride mass transit at gunpoint as well?!?
The destruction of the overpass has increased gridlock and commute times, keeping working parents away from their children and harming the well-being of those traditional American families. Which San Francisco organization has been steadily working to destroy the American family? Our researchers have already discovered that “429″ may be a telltale sign of homosexual operatives at work: the numbers spell “GAY” using the keypad of an American telephone.
Also suspicious is a well-timed “rally” by the anti-car, anti-highway-overpass, homosexual-friendly group Critical Mass held nine hours before the attack, likely to provide distraction and cover in the west for the covert demolitions team working on the east side of the Bay Bridge. The Critical Mass manifesto espousing a “counter-technological tradition” certainly allows them ample room for covert military strikes at the heart of modern technological progress. The demolition team’s work has brought more demand for truck “safety” regulators and brought more money and power to the same DPT workers who had unrestricted access to those bridges and overpasses before the attack. COINCIDENCE?
Hats off to 911researchers.com and their willingness to ask the tough questions about 4/29, which they agree ’smacks too much of a script for a plain “conspiracy theory”‘. As they point out the “Decrepit Freeway [was] Demolished Ahead of Schedule to Influence 9/11 Truth Movement”. IndependentSources.com joins our suspicions by reporting that no one has benefited more than 9/11 conspiracy deniers themselves who are seizing on the tragedy of 4/29 as a way to mock their search for the truth. IndependentSources claims that 4/29 “was a “black bag op” carried out jointly by the CIA and the Office of the First Lady” but we see the fingerprints of different organizations on this one. The internet in general and the San Francisco bay area in particular is filled with fools and scoffers who theorize that 4/29 was merely a common accident and that common fire melted the bridge’s steel as a way to refute the widely accepted theory that demolition charges were necessary to bring down those towers. Yes, dear readers, I am implying that in exactly the same way that the World Trade Center was demolished the overpass could have been intentionally demolished by 9/11 conspiracy deniers themselves! Any website or organization which uses the events of 4/29 to discredit the 9/11 conspiracy should be viewed with very serious suspicion. They have shown that they are all too willing to benefit both politically and materially from this tragedy.
Meanwhile, more puzzling evidence has appeared to challenge the official story. Portions of the burned concrete have inexplicably “turned pink like a salmon“, and investigators are expanding their investigation of the near-miss on the Golden Gate Bridge as evidence of sabotage surfaces. You read it here first!
