Deprecated: add_option was called with an argument that is deprecated since version 2.3.0 with no alternative available. in /home/truth429/ on line 5071

Deprecated: get_settings is deprecated since version 2.1.0! Use get_option() instead. in /home/truth429/ on line 4777

Notice: register_sidebar was called incorrectly. No id was set in the arguments array for the "Sidebar 1" sidebar. Defaulting to "sidebar-1". Manually set the id to "sidebar-1" to silence this notice and keep existing sidebar content. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 4.2.0.) in /home/truth429/ on line 5229
4/ » 2007 » August

Archive for August, 2007

What a real accident looks like

Thursday, August 16th, 2007

A “firey” crash in Grand Junction, Colorado bears all the same marks of 4/29: a truck, an overpass, smoke scarring from a fire that engulfed the bridge. Unlike 4/29 the truck even hit a bridge support directly.


So why didn’t the bridge collapse like the 580/880 interchange? This story demonstrates that a truck crash cannot collapse an overpass – unless that bridge is loaded with thermite demolition charges.

Minnesota I-35W: Controlled Demolition?

Friday, August 3rd, 2007

New reports from wednesday’s bridge collapse continue to raise troubling questions over the role of the Minnesota state government. Let’s start with the collapse of the structure itself:


As videos show, the 458-foot span took less than 4 seconds to collapse neatly into its footprint at nearly free-fall speeds. Like skyscrapers, bridges are not designed to implode. For the bridge to collapse in this fashion, all of the load bearing supports would have had to fail at exactly the same time. Is the government’s “truss theoryplausible? Thermite is necessary, especially since witnesses claim to have heard “explosions” and loud booms or other popping sounds prior to the collapse. Is this how a bridge not scheduled for replacement until 2020 would respond on an otherwise ordinary day? Eyewitnesses report an event “as loud as a plane crash“, hinting at what might have really taken the bridge down.

Investigators are attempting to simulate the collapse with a computer model generated by a University of Minnesota PhD Candidate but have been unable to do so: “the computer analysis involves removing selected parts of the bridge structure until the bridge falls down“. Faulty computer simulations have long been the tool of coverup artists, especially those in the habit of producing simulations with 40% of the structure’s supports removed.

Don’t let eccentric conspiracy theorists discredit the truth movement and persuade you that the only legitimate story is the official story. It may be too early to point fingers, but even the most cursory reading of yesterday’s news reveals questions that the authorities seem all too eager to simply dismiss.


I-35W Bridge Collapse Proves 4/29 Sabotage

Wednesday, August 1st, 2007

MINNEAPOLIS: Wednesday evening the I-35W Bridge “spontaneously” collapsed. What caused the collapse? A burning truck can be clearly seen in many photographs, but it is impossible for this fire to have caused the collapse since petroleum fire cannot melt steel. Did anyone know about the collapse? A press release from the Minnesota Department of Transportation warned drivers to avoid the bridge hours before the incident occurred.

To quote Sherlock Holmes, “Eliminate all other factors, and the one which remains must be the truth.”